Showing posts with label Brazilian regulatory agency.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Brazilian regulatory agency.. Show all posts

Monday, May 5, 2014

Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency simplifies Import processes

Anvisa (Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency) is adopting actions in order to improve the import processes of healthcare products. RDC 15/2014 introduces significant changes to the Certificate of Good Manufacturing Practices and aims to help the new technologies’ registration in Brazil.
First significant change is to validate auditing reports made by third parties  (other regulatory agencies). Also, Anvisa will no longer emit certificates for lower risk products, as gloves, syringes and some surgical devices. Although this measure removes the need for inspection,  it does not change the criteria of effectiveness and security required. Finally, Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency will allow that the protocol of the certificate request is accepted to submit registration applications, maintenance and amendments of highest risk products. This means that a manufacturer will no longer need to wait  for grant of certificate to have an analysis of his products started. With the two processes happening concurrently, the time of arrival of new equipment in the market should be reduced.


References: http://saudeweb.com.br/42867/anvisa-simplifica-processo-de-importacao-de-produtos-de-saude/

Monday, April 22, 2013

Meanwhile in the Brazilian Medical Device Industry


     Since Brazil has become one of the main destinies of many sectors worldwide, either because of its market size or its rising middle class, constantly monitoring what is happening inside its borders has become a routine task for foreign investors. The medical device industry is no exception, especially with such complex/bureaucratic regulatory system.

        However, this seems to be heading to a more harmonized system. A new Brazilian Good Manufacturing Practice (BGMP), RDC 16/2013, has gone into effect in the country. It means that two different BGMP resolutions (RDC 59/2000 for medical devices and Ordinance 686/1998 for in vitro diagnostic (IVD) devices) have been replaced by the new single one. The sector now only have one requirement to meet, hence, the BGMP has become less complicated. Companies now have 180 days to update their quality system and make it meet RDC 16/2013.    
       
        Another fact that has happened to the Brazilian medical device industry, and deserves both national and  foreign attention: in the end of last month (March, 2013) the Brazilian Medical Device Industry Association (ABIMO) has claimed, in Congress, the approval of a law that ensure tax isonomy between brazilian and imported products. Today, public and philanthropic hospitals have tax immunity when purchasing imported medical device.

“We do not want differential treatment. We are competitive. We export to more than 180 countries. Abimo’s proposal is simple: ensure tax immunity for all purchase orders made by institutions linked to SUS (Brazilian public healtcare system).”

Paulo Henrique Fraccaro, Abimo’s President            

        These two initiatives seem to be an effort to boost the national industry and make it more competitive. 


References: 

Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Another Attempt to Globalize the Medical Device Industry


When it comes to a globalized economy, one obstacle always bothers the free trade: the regulatory systems of the countries. To stimulate the global economy and favor the free international trade, it is important to think of a way to converge rules and so, the free movement of goods will not become a slow bureaucratic process. As for a harmonized regulatory system for medical devices, the task is even harder because it also deals with national health laws.

This was the concern when in 1992 the European Union (EU), the United States, Canada, Japan and Australia gathered together to establish a method to harmonize the regulations on medical device. The voluntary group was called Global Harmonization Task Force (GHTF) and brought together representatives from medical device regulatory agencies and the regulated industry from its founding members.

Almost 20 years later, the new economic scenario called for new representatives. So, “to build on the strong foundation work of the GHTF and to accelerate international medical device regulatory harmonization and convergence”, the International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF) was conceived in February 2011, replacing the GHTF. Besides the original 5 founding members of the GHTF, it included Brazil to the discussion of future directions in forming an international harmonized and convergent regulatory system for medical devices.

The membership of China and Russia are currently being confirmed and the new Forum, including the 6 official members, China and the WHO (World Health Organization, an observer member), met in Ottawa in October 2011 to establish strategic topics for its operation.

Trying to standardize rules among the GHTF member countries was a big challenge, now with the creation of the IMDRF and new members added, the debate becomes even harder. Despite the adversity, the future results might turn out to be stronger and more creative once it takes into consideration different points of view. There is still a long way of hard work to build a harmonized and convergent regulatory system, which provides solutions to all the five countries and EU’s concerns. We hope the members create an environment of dialog to accelerate the harmonization and convergence of their regulatory systems, so that we could have a real “international medical device regulatory system”.


References: http://www.imdrf.org/

Monday, June 4, 2012

Brazilian private and public health system coverage growth


Brazilian health insurance market has reached revenues of  US$ 41 billion in 2011, increasing 11.7% over 2010, according to the National Health Agency (ANS).

The number of people covered by health insurance increased 4.3% and reached 47.6 million in December (about 25% of the brazilian population).

There were 1,600 health insurance operators in Brazil by the end of 2011. Three major health insurance groups - Amil, Bradesco and Intermédica - have approximately 13 million customers, which means nearly 30% of the 47.6 million users.

Following the same growth trend, SUS (Brazilian Public National Health Care System) has coverage of about 63% of the brazilian population and carries out 75% of the high-complexity procedures, playing a very important role in the entire health care chain in Brazil.

Although still representing around 1.2% of world medical products market, data indicates a growth rate above the world average in Brazil, while the government has been creating several incentives for the development of domestic medical products industry.

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Brazil and the Global Harmonization Task Force (GHTF)

According to the FDA, the Global Harmonization Task Force (GHTF) fosters international harmonization in the regulation of medical devices. Regulatory and industry authorities from Europe, Asia-Pacific and North America collaborate to encourage the harmonization of regulatory practices to ensure the safety, effectiveness and quality of medical devices.

The GHTF was founded in 1992 and its main purpose is to standardize medical device regulations around the world by the exchange of information. Some of the benefits of the standardization are the convergence in regulatory practices related to ensuring safety and facilitating international trade.

On November 11, Brazil, Argentina, Colombia and Cuba’s regulatory agencies agreed to work in cooperation, through the inspection of manufacturers of medical devices in each country. The Brazilian regulatory agency (ANVISA) requires a Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) certification from medical devices manufacturers, and the inspection is conducted by the agency itself. From January of 2013 the GMP certification issued by the Argentinean, Colombian, and Cuban agencies will be accepted in Brazil as well, which means more efficiency in the certification process.